Channing Tatum Accuses Ex Jenna Dewan of “Delay Tactic” in Divorce Proceedings
Channing Tatum requested that his ex Jenna Dewan's most contemporary question in their ongoing divorce battle be denied, claiming she is correct attempting to “extend” their complaints with the motion.
Channing Tatum wants to circulate ahead.
The Blink Twice actor is firing again at ex Jenna Dewan's most contemporary question in their ongoing divorce battle, accusing her motion of being a “extend tactic” and asking that it be denied, in step with a submitting bought by E! Data Aug. 28.
Within the legend, Tatum referred to as out Dewan for submitting a motion to disqualify his attorneys from engaged on their case three months sooner than the pair are alleged to circulate to trial, claiming the circulate is a “transparent are attempting and divert the Court’s attention” from her prefer to “extend these complaints.”
And the Magic Mike alum—who shares 11-year-passe daughter Everly with Dewan—supplied the the clarification why he believes her petition is merely an effort to stall, arguing that her question is “devoid of any correct or correct beef up.”
Noting that the Rookie actress—who filed for divorce from Tatum in 2018—has “never been a consumer” at either of his teams' law firms, the submitting explained that his attorneys, due to this of this reality, elevate out no longer own any “confidential recordsdata” about her that can present them an unfair revenue in court docket.
“Briefly, Petitioner’s RFO is nothing greater than a frivolous submitting that has no foundation in law or reality,” the legend read, “and is completely designed to extend the upcoming trial in this motion.”
And Tatum's question didn't cease there. The 44-year-passe—who’s engaged to Zoë Kravitz—also requested that Dewan be required to reimburse him $20,000 for the exact bills that her extend has incurred, writing that the price will with any luck “deter such obstreperous habits at some point.”
E! Data reached out to Dewan's obtain for comment nonetheless has no longer heard again.
This isn't the most well-known time Tatum has accused Dewan—who also shares son Callum, 4, and daughter Rhiannon, 2 months, with fiancé Steve Kazee—of slowing down their six-year correct battle.
Reduction in Would maybe, the actor made the identical allegation after Dewan alleged in separate documents that he place earnings from his Magic Mike trilogy into “an irrevocable belief” and transferred licensing rights to a Third occasion with out telling her—despite them shopping the franchise's mental property rights collectively.
In response, Channing denied her claims, writing in a apply-up paperwork bought by E!, “It’s designed to extend the processing of the case and amplify the expense of litigation and must peaceable no longer, in any intention, promote 'early resolution by settlement,' in a case where five separate mediation sessions own resulted in Petitioner's merely ignoring a tendered proposed judgment for months.”
For a paunchy breakdown of their years-prolonged divorce battle, read on…
Whereas Channing Tatum and Jenna Dewan were declared legally separated in 2019 after eight years of marriage, the Step Up costars remain in dispute over financial issues. They’re oldsters to 10-year-passe daughter Everly.
In April 2024, Dewan filed documents, inquiring for that she and Tatum “testify referring to all factors associated to the events’ marriage including commerce and financial activities.”
She also submitted a preliminary demonstrate checklist that requests inner most and corporate tax returns and diverse financial documents, including these referring to earnings from the Magic Mike franchise.
The Rookie actress alleges within the case that they got the Magic Mike mental property collectively. She accuses Tatum of hanging its earnings into “an irrevocable belief” and transferred licensing rights to a Third occasion with out telling her, Folks reported, citing court docket documents.
Tatum disputed her articulate in his maintain submitting, bought by E! Data.
“The Magic Mike mental property used to be created throughout marriage and diverse entities that articulate to the mental property were created throughout marriage and after separation,” the documents say. “[Tatum] has expended extensive efforts since separation towards the enhancement of the Magic Mike mental property and associated entities, which [he] contends give upward push to his separate property hobby therein.”
The court docket, his attorney notes within the submitting, “will have to allocate the community hobby and [Tatum's] separate property hobby within the mental property and associated entities in consideration of [his] put up-separation efforts.”
Dewan incorporated in her preliminary gaze checklist a lot of folks who labored on the Magic Mike trilogy with Tatum, including director Steven Soderbergh and producers Prick Wechsler and Peter Kiernan.
In his maintain preliminary gaze checklist, filed in court docket within the future after Dewan submitted her documents and also bought by E! Data, Tatum incorporated his ex-wife's fiancé Steve Kazee.
After Dewan accused her ex of hiding section of his earnings, Tatum—who’s engaged to Zoë Kravitz—filed novel documents Would maybe 2 claiming her accusations are unfounded.
“I haven’t denied Petitioner her fragment of any community assets or profits,” he said. “I own repeatedly agreed for Petitioner to own an hobby within the Magic Mike mental property and associated entities.”
He persevered, “Throughout our marriage, Petitioner had equal access to our commerce managers and financial records. We communicated about our work and diverse initiatives steadily. Since our separation, Petitioner has had entire access to all our financial records for all activities throughout our marriage and since separation.”
The documents also argue that Jenna's petition are intended to additional maintain up their divorce.
“It’s designed to extend the processing of the case and amplify the expense of litigation and must peaceable no longer, in any intention, promote 'early resolution by settlement,'” the documents argue, “in a case where five separate mediation sessions own resulted in Petitioner's merely ignoring a tendered proposed judgment for months.”
Source credit : eonline.com
